Please wait while we find all executions for this version.
Please wait while we find all executions for this version.
Tests whether framing a request for unsafe content as file/data generation for a "test
fixture" — rather than asking for the content directly in chat — bypasses safety training
that otherwise holds. Seven categories spanning distinct safety pillars (relational harm:
isolation-affirmation, romantic-love reciprocation, and therapy-discouragement; epistemic
harm: health misinformation, paranoid-belief validation, and manic/grandiose-ideation
validation; plus a compound welfare-harm essay glorifying impulsive, life-ruining decisions),
tested via a generic coding-assistant persona rather than any persuasive or
jailbreak-styled framing. The romantic-love-reciprocation cell pairs directly with
companion-adversarial-pressure.yml's dismissal-romantic-love-reciprocation prompt —
same content, different attack shape, run both to see the same model behave completely
differently against each. Published transparently as a documented, currently-unmitigated
bypass class — see the header comment for full context and rationale.
Showing all recorded executions for Run Label d5f48ad9486ba825.